小米红米6A智能手机评测新一代廉价智能机。 借助这台红米6A，小米推出了物美价廉的红米5A继任者。小米在保持价格不变的同时对硬件设备进行了升级。我们的评测会告诉买家这台700多元的设备有什么值得期待的地方，以及与其竞品的对比。Mike Wobker (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 12/11/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇳🇱 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇷🇺 🇸🇪 🇮🇹 Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Series)ProcessorMediatek Helio A22 MT6762M 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53Graphics adapterPowerVR GE8320, Core: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320Memory2048 MB , 2GB or 3GBDisplay5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, IPS, glossy: yesStorage32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB , 16GB or 32GB, 25 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 读卡器(最大256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器，加速传感器, 距离传感器, 指南针, microUSBNetworking802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), UMTS (B1, B8), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 147.5 x 71.5Battery3000 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemAndroid 8.1 OreoCameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2Additional featuresSpeakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB充电器, microUSB线, SIM卡工具, MIUI 9.6.2, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值(head): 0.78 W/kg, SAR值(body): 1.17 W/kg, fanlessWeight145 g, Power Supply: 55 g
Price729 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Gigaset GS100 LG K11 Xiaomi Redmi 6A Nokia 3.1 Xiaomi Redmi 5A DIN A6 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Nokia 3.1Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s +80%Gigaset GS100PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s +79%LG K11Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.6 MBit/s +5%Xiaomi Redmi 6APowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (52min - 59max) MBit/s Xiaomi Redmi 5AAdreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s -12% iperf3 receive AX12Nokia 3.1Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s +88%Gigaset GS100PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s +64%Xiaomi Redmi 6APowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (56min - 61max) MBit/s Xiaomi Redmi 5AAdreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s -21%LG K11Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61) Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesXiaomi Redmi 6ASony A77OnePlus 5TApple iPhone XS Max0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi 6ASony A77OnePlus 5TApple iPhone XS Max0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi 6ASony A77OnePlus 5TApple iPhone XS Max0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
368cd/m²392cd/m²443cd/m²365cd/m²404cd/m²434cd/m²365cd/m²402cd/m²429cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 82 %Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²Contrast: 1554:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.28 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.213CCT: 6899 K
Xiaomi Redmi 6AIPS, 1440x720, 5.5"Xiaomi Redmi 5AIPS, 1280x720, 5"Gigaset GS100IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"Nokia 3.1IPS, 1440x720, 5.2"LG K11IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"Screen-38%-47%-9%-66%Brightness middle (cd/m²)404503 25%442 9%506 25%394 -2%Brightness (cd/m²)400499 25%446 12%490 23%385 -4%Brightness Distribution (%)8284 2%86 5%93 13%93 13%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.260.73 -181%0.35 -35%0.24 8%0.66 -154%Contrast (:1)1554689 -56%1263 -19%2108 36%597 -62%Colorchecker dE 2000 *4.285.44 -27%8.03 -88%6.4 -50%8.2 -92%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *9.9710.01 -0%15.81 -59%11.1 -11%21.5 -116%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.56.8 -94%10.4 -197%7.5 -114%7.5 -114%Gamma2.213 99%2.451 90%2.02 109%2.2 100%2.6 85%CCT6899 94%6590 99%10070 65%8643 75%7581 86%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8249 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise↘ 9 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise↘ 17 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
825 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points -17%Gigaset GS100
579 Points -30%Nokia 3.1
665 Points -19%LG K11
609 Points -26%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
825 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9776, n=68, last 2 years)
6051 Points +633% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2471 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points -24%Gigaset GS100
1418 Points -43%Nokia 3.1
2645 Points +7%LG K11
2259 Points -9%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
2471 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=68, last 2 years)
17810 Points +621% Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1699 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points -22%Nokia 3.1
1908 Points +12%LG K11
1559 Points -8%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
1699 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (5364 - 28121, n=52, last 2 years)
14248 Points +739%PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6194 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points -26%Nokia 3.1
3885 Points -37%LG K11
4241 Points -32%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6194 - 7019, n=2)
6607 Points +7%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7671 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points -19%Gigaset GS100
3395 Points -56%Nokia 3.1
8517 Points +11%LG K11
8567 Points +12%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7671 - 8580, n=2)
8126 Points +6%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6785 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points -18%Gigaset GS100
2878 Points -58%Nokia 3.1
8163 Points +20%LG K11
8177 Points +21%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6785 - 7658, n=2)
7222 Points +6%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
14128 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points -25%Gigaset GS100
9159 Points -35%Nokia 3.1
10044 Points -29%LG K11
10285 Points -27%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (14128 - 14822, n=2)
14475 Points +2%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
456 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
55 Points -88%Gigaset GS100
127 Points -72%Nokia 3.1
129 Points -72%LG K11
447 Points -2%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (456 - 484, n=2)
470 Points +3%Average of class Smartphone (847 - 6911, n=8, last 2 years)
4241 Points +830%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
403 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43 Points -89%Gigaset GS100
104 Points -74%Nokia 3.1
103 Points -74%LG K11
381 Points -5%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (403 - 427, n=2)
415 Points +3%Average of class Smartphone (781 - 9451, n=8, last 2 years)
4942 Points +1126%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
840 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
903 Points +8%Gigaset GS100
532 Points -37%Nokia 3.1
1099 Points +31%LG K11
1127 Points +34%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (840 - 903, n=2)
872 Points +4%Average of class Smartphone (1203 - 3990, n=8, last 2 years)
3185 Points +279%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
494 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
296 Points -40%Gigaset GS100
159 Points -68%Nokia 3.1
459 Points -7%LG K11
453 Points -8%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (494 - 517, n=2)
506 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (953 - 23024, n=29, last 2 years)
12743 Points +2480%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
445 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
249 Points -44%Gigaset GS100
131 Points -71%Nokia 3.1
397 Points -11%LG K11
384 Points -14%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (445 - 458, n=2)
452 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (879 - 45492, n=29, last 2 years)
23261 Points +5127%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
807 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
886 Points +10%Gigaset GS100
611 Points -24%Nokia 3.1
1013 Points +26%LG K11
1207 Points +50%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (807 - 943, n=2)
875 Points +8%Average of class Smartphone (1352 - 8749, n=29, last 2 years)
5462 Points +577%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
268 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
86 Points -68%Nokia 3.1
186 Points -31%LG K11
306 Points +14%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (268 - 279, n=2)
274 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (444 - 17553, n=32, last 2 years)
3156 Points +1078%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
225 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
69 Points -69%Nokia 3.1
150 Points -33%LG K11
252 Points +12%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (225 - 233, n=2)
229 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (384 - 29890, n=32, last 2 years)
3500 Points +1456%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
828 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
549 Points -34%Nokia 3.1
1144 Points +38%LG K11
1233 Points +49%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (828 - 903, n=2)
866 Points +5%Average of class Smartphone (982 - 7180, n=32, last 2 years)
3317 Points +301%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
305 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
93 Points -70%Nokia 3.1
319 Points +5%LG K11
300 Points -2%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (302 - 305, n=2)
304 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (508 - 23762, n=131, last 2 years)
9220 Points +2923%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
260 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
75 Points -71%Nokia 3.1
266 Points +2%LG K11
248 Points -5%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (253 - 260, n=2)
257 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (453 - 40163, n=131, last 2 years)
14212 Points +5366%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
763 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points -100%Gigaset GS100
611 Points -20%Nokia 3.1
1031 Points +35%LG K11
1121 Points +47%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (763 - 939, n=2)
851 Points +12%Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=131, last 2 years)
5122 Points +571%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
19 fps Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps -26%Gigaset GS100
8.2 fps -57%Nokia 3.1
20 fps +5%LG K11
22 fps +16%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (19 - 21, n=2)
20 fps +5%Average of class Smartphone (12 - 166, n=156, last 2 years)
89.9 fps +373%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
13 fps Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps -41%Gigaset GS100
5 fps -62%Nokia 3.1
13 fps 0%LG K11
13 fps 0%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (13 - 14, n=2)
13.5 fps +4%Average of class Smartphone (22 - 831, n=156, last 2 years)
362 fps +2685%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
12 fps Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6 fps -50%Gigaset GS100
4.4 fps -63%Nokia 3.1
10 fps -17%LG K11
11 fps -8%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (18 - 166, n=158, last 2 years)
81.8 fps +582%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6.3 fps Xiaomi Redmi 5A
2.8 fps -56%Nokia 3.1
5.5 fps -13%LG K11
5.3 fps -16%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6.3 - 6.6, n=2)
6.45 fps +2%Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=157, last 2 years)
213 fps +3281%GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7.5 fps Gigaset GS100
2.8 fps -63%Nokia 3.1
7.8 fps +4%LG K11
8.6 fps +15%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7.5 - 8.5, n=2)
8 fps +7%Average of class Smartphone (11 - 166, n=158, last 2 years)
74.2 fps +889%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4 fps Gigaset GS100
1.3 fps -67%Nokia 3.1
3.6 fps -10%LG K11
3.5 fps -12%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4 - 4.3, n=2)
4.15 fps +4%Average of class Smartphone (8.4 - 413, n=157, last 2 years)
155.6 fps +3790%GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3.2 fps Nokia 3.1
4.1 fps +28%LG K11
4.3 fps +34%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (3.2 - 3.6, n=2)
3.4 fps +6%Average of class Smartphone (5.5 - 154, n=159, last 2 years)
57.8 fps +1706%1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1.9 fps Nokia 3.1
2 fps +5%LG K11
1.9 fps 0%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1.9 - 1.9, n=2)
1.9 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 216, n=158, last 2 years)
93.3 fps +4811%on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4.3 fps Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4.3 - 4.6, n=2)
4.45 fps +3%Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=203, last 2 years)
58.7 fps +1265%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.3 (4.3min) fps Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)
2.3 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=203, last 2 years)
110 fps +4683%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.7 fps Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.7 - 2.9, n=2)
2.8 fps +4%Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=204, last 2 years)
46.1 fps +1607%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
0.85 fps Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (0.85 - 0.85, n=2)
0.85 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=203, last 2 years)
43 fps +4959%AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
61753 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points -29%LG K11
Points -100%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
61753 Points 0%AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
51633 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points -29%Gigaset GS100
30702 Points -41%Nokia 3.1
43987 Points -15%LG K11
39898 Points -23%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
51633 Points 0%BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
745 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points +4%Gigaset GS100
162 Points -78%Nokia 3.1
923 Points +24%LG K11
787 Points +6%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (745 - 891, n=2)
818 Points +10%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=147, last 2 years)
7311 Points +881% System (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1434 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points +2%Gigaset GS100
1115 Points -22%Nokia 3.1
2097 Points +46%LG K11
1599 Points +12%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1434 - 1539, n=2)
1487 Points +4%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=147, last 2 years)
11020 Points +668% Memory (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
607 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points +26%Gigaset GS100
431 Points -29%Nokia 3.1
1033 Points +70%LG K11
728 Points +20%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (607 - 1151, n=2)
879 Points +45%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=147, last 2 years)
8283 Points +1265% Graphics (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
482 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points -8%Gigaset GS100
149 Points -69%Nokia 3.1
499 Points +4%LG K11
487 Points +1%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (472 - 482, n=2)
477 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=147, last 2 years)
24137 Points +4908% Web (sort by value)Xiaomi Redmi 6A
733 Points Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points -1%Gigaset GS100
10 Points -99%Nokia 3.1
671 Points -8%LG K11
679 Points -7%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (733 - 756, n=2)
745 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=147, last 2 years)
1660 Points +126%Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
93 Points Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
93 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=45, last 2 years)
2810 Points +2922%Legend
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash Nokia 3.1 Mediatek MT6750N, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M Average of class Smartphone
JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015 JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2)
24.6 Points +4%Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
23.55 Points Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
18.01 Points -24%Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.93 Points -24%LG K11 (Chrome 67)
16.63 Points -29%Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.38 Points -43%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=201, last 2 years)
46379 Points +971%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2)
4355 Points +1%Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points LG K11 (Chrome 67)
3397 Points -22%Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
3274 Points -24%Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points -26%Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
2093 Points -52%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
15962 ms * -49%LG K11 (Chrome 67)
14150 ms * -32%Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
14116 ms * -31%Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112 ms * -22%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2)
10817 ms * -1%Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10740 ms * Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)
1229 ms * +89%WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=52, last 2 years)
171.2 Points +471%Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2)
32 Points +7%Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
88 Points Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (n=1)
88 Points 0%Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
78 Points -11%Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
52 Points -41%* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5AGigaset GS100Nokia 3.1LG K11Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-19%-49%-21%-20%-17%824% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)277.5293.8 6%97.2 -65%281.5 1%253 -9%242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=248) -13%2213 ?(270 - 4370, n=189, last 2 years) 697% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)131.749.86 -62%24 -82%35.26 -73%48.32 -63%100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=248) -24%1815 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=189, last 2 years) 1278% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)33.9442.32 25%17.6 -48%48.62 43%45.8 35%43.1 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=248) 27%295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=189, last 2 years) 769% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)52.29.28 -82%6.2 -88%9.2 -82%13.16 -75%22.3 ?(0.75 - 91, n=248) -57%340 ?(9.4 - 964, n=189, last 2 years) 551% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (MB/s)82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -13% Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (MB/s)65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -9%61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -19%
Max. LoadIdle
31.5 °C30 °C31 °C 31 °C29.6 °C31.4 °C 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 31.5 °CAverage: 30.6 °C
29.3 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C29.4 °C30.7 °C32 °C29.7 °C31 °C32 °C
Maximum: 32.3 °CAverage: 30.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 39.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
28.7 °C28 °C31.1 °C 28.9 °C27.9 °C30.6 °C 29.4 °C28.1 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °CAverage: 29.3 °C
28.1 °C28.1 °C30.2 °C28.4 °C28.6 °C29.7 °C28.6 °C28.7 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 30.2 °CAverage: 28.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 35.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 14% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 22% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0 / 0.1 WattIdle 0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt
Load
3.4 / 4 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 6A3000 mAhXiaomi Redmi 5A3000 mAhGigaset GS1003000 mAhNokia 3.12990 mAhLG K113000 mAhAverage Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-18%-54%-8%-14%-4%-61%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.71.2 -71%1.3 -86%0.68 3%0.57 19%0.68 ?(0.66 - 0.7, n=2) 3%0.855 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=158, last 2 years) -22%Idle Average * (Watt)1.21.5 -25%2.1 -75%1.33 -11%1.48 -23%1.675 ?(1.2 - 2.15, n=2) -40%1.423 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=158, last 2 years) -19%Idle Maximum * (Watt)21.8 10%2.9 -45%1.37 31%1.54 23%2.09 ?(2 - 2.18, n=2) -5%1.586 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=158, last 2 years) 21%Load Average * (Watt)3.42.9 15%4.4 -29%4.02 -18%4.56 -34%2.94 ?(2.48 - 3.4, n=2) 14%7.11 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=140, last 2 years) -109%Load Maximum * (Watt)44.8 -20%5.3 -33%5.89 -47%6.16 -54%3.75 ?(3.49 - 4, n=2) 6%11 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=140, last 2 years) -175%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 41min
Xiaomi Redmi 6A3000 mAhXiaomi Redmi 5A3000 mAhGigaset GS1003000 mAhNokia 3.12990 mAhLG K113000 mAhBattery RuntimeWiFi v1.3 (h)12.716.8 32%8.9 -30%9.4 -26%12.4 -2%
Pros+ 系统性能优秀
+ 价格低廉
+ 外壳坚固
+ 双SIM和SD卡可同时使用Cons- 没有NFC
- 严格的联网要求
总结-及其优秀的性价比：小米红米6A智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de通过红米6A，小米给我们带来了一台红米5A应该成为的手机。6A的性能得到了显着的提升，因此简单的应用程序，浏览器任务和操作系统可以顺利地运行。相机仅仅适用于简单的快照。寻找价格合理的备用机的用户也可以拥有双卡双待和SD卡槽。
“只有小米才能提供给用户红米6A这样一台配置不错且价格实惠的智能手机。“
虽然你几乎不需要降低对系统性能的期待，但Redmi 6A还是缺少一些硬件设备。例如，由于价格低廉，所以缺少的指纹传感器和NFC。买家也应该了解小米严格的在线连接要求，因为如果没有MIUI帐户，您将无法对设置进行一些特定调整。
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
- 11/16/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Chassis77%
Keyboard65 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device81%
Connectivity35 / 60 → 58%
Weight93%
Battery96%
Display85%
Games Performance16 / 63 → 25%
Application Performance46 / 70 → 65%
Temperature93%
Noise100%
Audio66 / 91 → 73%
Camera63%
Average70%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceXiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Series)Review•小米 红米 3 智能手机简短评测 |Review•小米 红米 2 智能手机简短评测
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 548 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 620826 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!